Outcome progress
Has the situation improved in the real world?
Low2024 was the most extreme year for forest fires since records began in 2001 and 2025 ranked third, with fires now causing a far larger share of tree cover loss than two decades ago.
Fire is a natural part of many landscapes, but extreme wildfires are becoming more frequent and destructive, now cause about four in ten hectares of the world's tree cover loss and fill the air with smoke linked to an estimated 1.5 million premature deaths a year, while prevention and community fire management remain underfunded.
Written from the sources listed below, not independently peer-reviewed.
Smoke from burning vegetation carries fine particles that damage the heart and lungs. Roughly how many premature deaths a year are estimated to result from it worldwide?
About 1.5 million
Premature deaths a year linked to fire smoke
Modelled estimate of deaths from fine particle pollution caused by fires, averaged over the years since 1990, from studies cited in the State of Wildfires 2024–2025 report.
Data year 2025. Source: Earth System Science Data, 17, 5377–5488, 2025
42%
Share of global tree cover loss caused by fire
Of the 25.5 million hectares of tree cover lost worldwide in 2025, according to Global Forest Watch satellite data published by WRI. Canada alone had 5.3 million hectares burned in its second-worst fire year on record.
Data year 2025. Source: World Resources Institute, 2026
3.7 million km²
Land burned in one fire season
At least this much land burned worldwide between March 2024 and February 2025, 9% below the 2002–2024 average, while carbon emissions from fires were 9% above average at 2.2 billion tonnes of carbon.
Data year 2024. Source: Earth System Science Data, 17, 5377–5488, 2025
Unit: % of tree cover loss per year
Two period averages from Global Forest Watch data, as reported by WRI and plotted at the end year of each period: about 27% a year on average in 2001–2022 and about 43% a year in 2023–2025. Single years vary widely, and 2024 was the worst year for forest fires in the record. Satellite estimates of the cause of loss are modelled and carry uncertainty.
There is no quantified international target for wildfires; they fall under the broad SDG 13 aim of strengthening resilience to climate-related hazards. The State of Wildfires 2025–26 projections show why climate policy matters: under a medium-high emissions pathway (SSP3-7.0), extreme fire events in its focal regions would burn 4–23% less than under the highest pathway, and meeting the Paris Agreement goals (SSP1-2.6) would cut the area burned in such events by a further 5–36%. These are model projections from a report still under peer review.
Smoke harms older people, young children, people with illness and Traditional communities most, often where public services and means of protection are poor. In 2024–2025, communities in Brazil, Bolivia, Southern California and northern India were exposed to fine particles at 13 to 60 times WHO's daily guideline.
Source: Earth System Science Data, 17, 5377–5488, 2025Fires in 2024–2025 killed 100 people in Nepal, 34 in South Africa and 31 in Los Angeles. Since 1990, wildfire disasters have killed or injured at least about 18,000 people, a count the State of Wildfires authors call conservative because records are incomplete and biased towards northern countries.
Source: Earth System Science Data, 17, 5377–5488, 2025In early 2026, fires in Chile and northwest Argentina killed 23 people and displaced 55,000. In Europe's 2025 season, fires killed 35 people across six countries and forced more than 110,000 evacuations in Türkiye, Spain and Greece.
Source: Earth System Science Data Discussions, 2026More than 60% of fire-related tree cover loss between 2001 and 2025 was in boreal forests, which store 30–40% of the carbon held on land. In 2023, record fires burned almost 7.8 million hectares of forest in Canada.
Source: World Resources Institute, 2026Instead of one “percent solved” score, DO GOOD rates three separate dimensions. A problem can have mature solutions that still reach too few people. These ratings are an editorial reading of the sources on this page, not a measured index.
Has the situation improved in the real world?
Low2024 was the most extreme year for forest fires since records began in 2001 and 2025 ranked third, with fires now causing a far larger share of tree cover loss than two decades ago.
How mature and validated are the available solutions?
ModerateFire danger forecasts, fuel reduction, controlled burning, suppression and integrated fire management are established, but the largest fires are increasingly hard to control and safe windows for controlled burning are shrinking as fire seasons lengthen.
How widely are effective solutions actually used?
LowWRI describes prevention as among the most cost-effective tools but underfunded in many countries, with communities often lacking equipment to respond and Indigenous Peoples often excluded from fire management decisions.
Satellite records of burned area and tree cover loss are consistent since the early 2000s, though they miss small fires. Records of deaths and losses are incomplete and biased towards northern countries, and smoke deaths are modelled estimates.
Total burned area is not rising globally, but forest fires are: fires burn more than twice as much tree cover a year as two decades ago and caused about 43% of tree cover loss in 2023–2025, up from about 27% in 2001–2022.
Many ecosystems, from African savannas to boreal forests, have burned for millennia, and tropical savannas account for around 70% of the land that burns each year. The problem is the growing number of extreme fires: blazes that spread too fast or burn too intensely to control, destroy homes and forests, and blanket whole regions in smoke. The total area burned worldwide has not risen; in the 2024–2025 fire season it was 9% below the long-term average. But carbon emissions from fires were 9% above average, because more of the burning hit forests. Forest fires now burn more than twice as much tree cover each year as they did two decades ago, 2024 was the worst year for forest fires since records began in 2001, and fires caused 42% of the world's tree cover loss in 2025. Climate change is a major driver: it made the fire weather behind recent disasters in northeast Amazonia, the Congo Basin, Canada and northwest Iberia between about two and 70 times more likely.
The harm reaches far beyond the fire line. Smoke carries fine particles linked to an estimated 1.5 million premature deaths a year, and in 2024–2025 communities in Brazil, Bolivia, Southern California and northern India breathed particle levels 13 to 60 times above the World Health Organization's daily guideline. Older people, young children, people with chronic illness and Traditional and Indigenous communities with few public services are hit hardest. Fires also kill directly, force mass evacuations and destroy livelihoods: the Los Angeles fires of early 2025 alone caused 31 deaths, about 150,000 evacuations and an estimated USD 140 billion in damage. In the tropics almost all fires are started by people, often to clear land, and in a warmer, drier climate these fires escape more easily into forests, releasing carbon that drives further warming.
No single number captures the wildfire problem. Scientists combine satellite observations with reports from fire agencies and other records:
Burned area
Satellites detect burn scars and add up the land burned in each fire season. These maps are the backbone of global statistics but miss many small fires, so totals are underestimates. Most of the area burned each year is savanna and grassland, where fire is often part of the ecosystem or of farming.
Fire carbon emissions
Emissions are estimated from how much vegetation burns. Because burning forests releases much more carbon per hectare than burning grassland, emissions can be above average even in a year when less land burns, as happened in 2024–2025.
Tree cover loss from fire
Global Forest Watch maps tree cover lost each year from satellite images and assigns a dominant cause, such as agriculture or fire. This shows where fire is destroying forests rather than renewing grasslands.
Human impacts and smoke
Deaths, evacuations and economic losses are gathered from national records, agency and disaster reports and the news, and are incomplete, especially outside richer northern countries. Smoke exposure is tracked as days on which fine particle pollution exceeds WHO's 24-hour guideline of 15 µg/m³, and smoke deaths are modelled estimates.
What works
Weather services now forecast fire danger from days up to about four months ahead, and the Copernicus Emergency Management Service publishes seasonal fire weather outlooks. Forecasts help agencies position crews, issue warnings, restrict burning and prepare evacuations before conditions peak.
Limits
A forecast only helps if it triggers action on the ground and warnings reach remote and rural communities. Its effect on deaths and damage has rarely been measured.
What works
Land managers thin vegetation and use low-intensity controlled burns to remove the fuel that feeds intense fires, especially near settlements. Indigenous Peoples and local communities have used such burning for centuries to keep landscapes resilient.
Limits
Longer and hotter fire seasons are shrinking the weather windows in which controlled burning is safe, treatments must be repeated, and they do not stop fires driven by extreme wind and drought.
What works
Almost all fires in the tropics are started by people, often to clear land or manage pasture. Ending deforestation and degradation makes forests more resilient, and limiting burning near forests, especially in droughts, prevents fires from escaping into them.
Limits
Many farmers depend on fire as the cheapest way to clear land, enforcement in remote frontier areas is weak, and deforestation pressures are driven by distant markets.
What works
Local fire brigades and communities who know the land can prevent and catch fires early. WRI recommends securing land rights and giving dedicated funding and equipment to local brigades so that Indigenous Peoples and local communities can lead fire management where they live.
Limits
These groups are often excluded from fire management decisions, and many communities still lack the equipment and resources to respond quickly.
What works
Fire agencies are expanding or reallocating resources to put out fires quickly, which protects lives, homes and infrastructure when fires do start.
Limits
Suppression is costly, and the largest, fastest fires are increasingly hard to control however many resources are deployed.
Promising, but not proven at scale. The stage shows how far each approach has come; it is not a recommendation.
The State of Wildfires project now reports each year how much climate change and land use contributed to the worst fires, and publishes 17 new or updated datasets with its 2025–26 report. It aims to monitor extreme fire seasons as they unfold. The findings inform policy but do not themselves reduce risk.
Data-driven fire models such as the Probability of Fire model are now used to explain what drove extreme fire seasons, alongside fire weather forecasts from days to months ahead. Turning them into routine, local warnings for land managers and communities is still being developed.
Mechanisms such as the Forest Resilience Bond and watershed resilience funds give upfront money for controlled burning, restoration and other risk reduction before fires start, repaid by those who benefit, such as utilities or water users. Few such schemes exist so far, and their long-term results are not yet known.
Implementation gap
Prevention and preparedness are among the most cost-effective tools but are underfunded in many countries, while spending flows to fighting fires once they have started.
Coordination gap
Indigenous Peoples and local communities, who often hold long experience of managing fire, are frequently excluded from decisions, and many communities lack the equipment to respond quickly when fires start.
Coordination gap
In the tropics most fires are lit by people, often for pasture and land clearing. Reducing them depends on agriculture, land rights, trade and law enforcement, not on fire agencies alone.
Knowledge gap
The global count of at least about 18,000 people killed or injured by wildfire disasters since 1990 is a conservative figure from incomplete records biased towards northern countries, so the toll in Africa, Asia and Latin America is poorly known.
Technology gap
Global satellite maps underestimate burned area because many small fires go undetected, and Earth observation does not capture all fires that harm people.
Technology gap
Larger, faster fires are harder to suppress, and longer fire seasons shrink the windows for safe controlled burning, so the tools that worked in the past are losing ground as the climate warms.
Unresolved questions, not vetted breakthroughs. Answering any of them would change what is possible.
How much do fuel reduction, controlled burning, burning restrictions and community brigades actually reduce deaths, damage and forest loss in different ecosystems, and at what cost compared with suppression?
How large are the long-term effects of repeated smoke exposure on children, older people and people with chronic disease, and which protective measures, such as clean-air shelters or filters, reduce harm most in low-income settings?
Are more frequent boreal and tropical forest fires pushing these forests towards releasing more carbon than they absorb, and how strongly does this feed back on climate change?
How can deaths, displacement and losses from fires be recorded consistently in countries where they are currently missed, so that global estimates are not biased towards richer northern countries?
If you live in a fire-prone area, follow local fire danger warnings, know your evacuation routes and keep the area around your home clear of dry vegetation and debris. On smoky days, stay indoors with windows closed and check on older neighbours and people with heart or lung disease.
Respect burn bans, do not burn waste or garden material in dry or windy weather, and put out campfires and cigarettes completely. Most fires are started by people.
Donate to or volunteer with organisations that train and equip local fire brigades or support Indigenous and community-led land management, and choose products that are certified free of deforestation where you can.
Ideas visitors sent in for this challenge, read by the DO GOOD team and pinned with permission. The colour shows the kind of contribution.
Loading the board…
What happens next
The DO GOOD team reads every idea and sorts it by colour: solution, research question, existing project, evidence or local action.
If you agree to publication, it can be pinned to this board. Contact details are never shown.
Pinned ideas are not reviewed by scientists and are not endorsed by DO GOOD.
This page is a research overview. DO GOOD does not run a dedicated programme on this challenge, and donations are not earmarked for it. You can join our volunteer work and outreach.
Earth System Science Data, 17, 5377–5488 (Jones, Kelley, Burton, Di Giuseppe et al., 16 October 2025), published 2025
Peer-reviewed annual global assessment of fire activity, its causes and impacts. Source of the 2024–2025 burned area and emissions, deaths, evacuations and losses, smoke exposure, attribution to climate change, the estimate of about 1.5 million premature deaths a year from fire smoke, savanna share of burned area, and limits of impact records.
Earth System Science Data Discussions (Burton, Di Giuseppe, Jones, Kelley et al., 3 August 2026), published 2026
Latest edition of the annual report, covering March 2025 to February 2026; still under peer review in October 2026. Source of the 2025–2026 global and regional figures (Canada, Europe, Chile and Argentina), the WHO smoke guideline used, the projections under different emissions pathways and the 17 new datasets.
World Resources Institute (MacCarthy, Richter, Tyukavina, Potapov, Harris; updated 4 August 2026), published 2026
WRI analysis of Global Forest Watch data on fire-driven tree cover loss for 2001–2025. Source of the doubling of forest area burned, fire's share of tree cover loss, the boreal and tropical patterns, record years, human ignition in the tropics, and WRI's recommendations on prevention, community fire management and finance.
World Resources Institute (press release, 29 April 2026), published 2026
Release of Global Forest Watch tree cover loss data for 2025. Source of the 25.5 million hectares of global tree cover loss, the 42% caused by fire, and the 5.3 million hectares burned in Canada.
DO GOOD International (2026). Living with Extreme Wildfires. Global Challenges. Updated October 15, 2026. https://www.dogood.world/challenges/wildfires
For figures, please cite the original sources listed above.