Outcome progress
Has the situation improved in the real world?
LowThe world produced twice as much plastic waste in 2019 as two decades earlier, and only 9% was recycled. No global estimate shows leakage into the environment falling.
The world now produces around 475 million tonnes of plastic a year but recycles less than a tenth of its plastic waste, and tens of millions of tonnes escape into the environment each year, much of it burned in the open or carried by rivers towards the sea.
Updated October 13, 2026. Written from the sources listed below, not independently peer-reviewed.
Out of every 100 kg of plastic waste generated worldwide in 2019, how many kg were actually recycled?
475 million tonnes
Plastics produced worldwide
Up from about 2 million tonnes in 1950. Without intervention, production is projected to nearly triple, to about 1,200 million tonnes, by 2060.
Data year 2022. Source: The Lancet, vol. 406, pp. 1044–59, 2025
9%
Share of plastic waste recycled
Of 353 million tonnes of plastic waste generated, 15% was collected for recycling, but nearly 40% of that was lost as residues. Recycled plastic supplied only 6% of all plastics used.
Data year 2019. Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2022
52.1 million tonnes
Plastic released into the environment from municipal waste
Modelled estimate for large plastic items, with a range of 48.3–56.3 million tonnes. About 57% was burned in open fires and 43% remained as debris; 20 countries account for 69% of the total.
Data year 2020. Source: Nature, vol. 633, pp. 101–108, 2024
Unit: million tonnes
* Projection, not a measurement. Values for 1950 and 2022 are estimates reported by the Lancet Countdown on health and plastics, based on OECD data. The 2060 value is a projection of production without intervention, not a measurement. The source does not report the years in between, so none are shown.
SDG target 14.1 set 2025 as the deadline to prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution, including marine debris, and target 12.5 aims to substantially reduce waste generation by 2030. A legally binding global treaty on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment, is still not agreed: the negotiating session in Geneva in August 2025, attended by delegates from 183 countries, adjourned without consensus on a text. After the Chair resigned, a new Chair was elected in February 2026 and the committee continues its work.
Plastic waste per person is highest in rich countries: 221 kg in the United States in 2019, 114 kg in European OECD countries and 69 kg on average in Japan and Korea. Mismanagement of waste, by contrast, happens mainly in developing countries.
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2022The waste of about 1.5 billion people in the Global South is not collected, leaving them little choice but to manage it themselves. Uncollected waste causes 68% of plastic pollution in the Global South, while littering is the largest source in the Global North.
Source: Nature, vol. 633, pp. 101–108, 2024Twenty countries account for 69% of plastic pollution from municipal waste. India emitted the most in 2020, 9.3 million tonnes or nearly one-fifth of the global total, and people in sub-Saharan Africa emitted about 12 kg each a year on average.
Source: Nature, vol. 633, pp. 101–108, 2024The health harms of plastics fall disproportionately on low-income and at-risk populations. Waste workers typically lack protective equipment, and infants and young children are especially susceptible.
Source: The Lancet, vol. 406, pp. 1044–59, 2025Each country is shaded by its latest available value, so you can see where the gap is widest. Hover or tap a country, search for one, or open the full table.
Loading country values…
Values in kg per person per year.
Modelled estimates of macroplastic (pieces larger than 5 mm) that escapes waste management and enters the environment as debris or is burned in open, uncontrolled fires, from uncollected waste, litter, collection losses, open dumps and sorting rejects. All values are for 2020, the latest (and only) year available per country, and carry wide uncertainty; low values in rich countries do not mean they generate little plastic waste, and plastic exported as waste is not counted where it is finally lost.
Source: Cottom et al. (2024), Nature, via Our World in Data. Latest year available per country; years differ.
Values load from Our World in Data. Simplified Natural Earth borders; they imply no position on disputed territories.
Instead of one “percent solved” score, DO GOOD rates three separate dimensions. A problem can have mature solutions that still reach too few people. These ratings are an editorial reading of the sources on this page, not a measured index.
Has the situation improved in the real world?
LowThe world produced twice as much plastic waste in 2019 as two decades earlier, and only 9% was recycled. No global estimate shows leakage into the environment falling.
How mature and validated are the available solutions?
ModerateWaste collection, sanitary landfills, recycling, producer responsibility and restrictions on single-use items are well established. OECD modelling suggests that a comprehensive mix of policies across the whole life cycle could cut leakage by 96% by 2040, but this is a scenario, and large reductions in plastic use have rarely been demonstrated in practice.
How widely are effective solutions actually used?
LowThe waste of about 1.5 billion people in the Global South is not collected, and uncollected waste causes 68% of plastic pollution there. Measures that reduce plastic use remain patchy and mostly national.
Production figures are fairly solid, but leakage is modelled from scarce waste data. One river model puts plastic reaching the ocean in 2015 at 0.8–2.7 million tonnes, with predictions for individual rivers that can differ from field measurements by a factor of four or more, and other studies estimate several times more. The health effects of micro- and nanoplastics in people remain uncertain.
Without intervention, global plastic production is projected to nearly triple by 2060, and the treaty negotiations have not yet produced an agreed text.
Plastic production has grown from about 2 million tonnes in 1950 to 475 million tonnes in 2022, and single-use items make up an estimated 35–40% of current output. Much of it soon becomes waste. The OECD estimates that the world generated 353 million tonnes of plastic waste in 2019, twice as much as two decades earlier, and that only 9% was recycled; the rest was landfilled, incinerated or mismanaged, which means dumped, burned in the open or never collected. In 2019 about 22 million tonnes of plastic leaked into the environment, 6.1 million tonnes of it into rivers, lakes and seas and 1.7 million tonnes into the ocean, and by then some 139 million tonnes had built up in aquatic environments.
Rich countries generate the most plastic waste per person, 221 kg in the United States in 2019 and 114 kg in European OECD countries, but pollution is concentrated where waste is not collected. A 2024 study estimated that 52.1 million tonnes of plastic from municipal waste escaped into the environment in 2020, that 57% of it was burned in open fires and that the waste of about 1.5 billion people in the Global South goes uncollected. Plastics can harm health at every stage of their life cycle: more than 16,000 chemicals can be present in plastics, and tiny plastic particles have been reported in human blood, placenta and brain, although what they do to health is not yet established. These harms fall disproportionately on low-income and at-risk groups, including waste workers and young children.
There is no single global measure of plastic pollution. SDG target 12.5 aims, by 2030, to substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse, and target 14.1 aimed, by 2025, to prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution, including marine debris, with plastic debris density as one of its indicators. Most global figures come from models that combine production, trade and waste data:
Plastic waste and what happens to it
The tonnes of plastic waste generated each year and the shares that are recycled, incinerated, put in sanitary landfills or mismanaged. 'Recycled' counts only what remains after sorting and processing losses, which is why it is lower than the share collected for recycling.
Mismanaged waste
Plastic waste that is not recycled, incinerated or kept in sealed landfills: waste that is never collected, dumped in open or unsanitary dumpsites, burned in open fires or littered. It is the main pathway by which plastic escapes into the environment.
Leakage or emissions
Plastic that actually ends up in the environment. Studies differ in scope: some count only large items from municipal waste, including plastic burned in the open, while others also include microplastics lost through the abrasion and wear of plastic products. Their totals are therefore not directly comparable.
Micro- and nanoplastics
Fragments smaller than 5 mm, down to nanoplastics smaller than a micrometre. They are left out of most river and ocean models, and particles smaller than about 1–10 micrometres are hard to measure reliably in human tissue and other samples, partly because contamination is hard to rule out.
What works
Collecting household waste and taking it to controlled sites removes the largest source of plastic pollution in the Global South. A 2024 global inventory concluded that tackling uncollected waste would have a bigger impact than tackling all other land-based sources of large plastic items combined.
Limits
Collection needs steady municipal budgets, fees, vehicles and staff, which many fast-growing towns lack. Much of the work is done by informal waste pickers without protection, and landfills and incinerators bring their own emissions and land use.
What works
Separate collection, sorting and mechanical recycling turn used plastic into new material and reduce the need for new plastic. Design rules that favour single materials and fewer additives make products easier to recycle.
Limits
In 2019 only 15% of plastic waste was collected for recycling, nearly 40% of that was lost as residues, and recycled plastic supplied just 6% of plastics use. Mixed materials, additives and contamination lower quality, and recycled plastic competes with cheap new plastic.
What works
Extended producer responsibility makes companies that sell packaged goods pay for collecting and recycling the packaging, and deposits on bottles and cans give people a reason to return them. Both shift costs from municipalities to producers.
Limits
Such schemes exist mostly in higher-income countries. Fees are often too low to change product design, and they finance waste management without capping the amount of plastic put on the market.
What works
Bans, levies and standards for items such as bags, cutlery and some packaging target products that are used briefly and often littered. Single-use items make up an estimated 35–40% of plastic output.
Limits
Substitutes such as paper or other materials can have their own environmental costs, enforcement is often weak, and most measures cover only a few items, so overall plastic use keeps growing.
What works
Organised clean-ups remove litter where it harms people and wildlife and, when items are recorded, show which products and brands end up in the environment most often.
Limits
Clean-ups remove only a small fraction of what leaks each year, cannot recover microplastics and do nothing to stop new plastic arriving, so they complement rather than replace prevention.
Promising, but not proven at scale. The stage shows how far each approach has come; it is not a recommendation.
A global model found that more than 1,000 rivers carry 80% of the plastic that rivers bring to the ocean, with small urban rivers in Southeast Asia and West Africa among the main hotspots. Floating barriers and collection systems are being tested in some such rivers; they catch mainly floating litter, and their effect on total ocean inputs has not been measured at scale.
A 2024 inventory estimated plastic emissions for 50,702 municipalities, showing whether uncollected waste, litter or dumpsites dominate in each place. Such maps could help cities and funders target collection, but the authors note that there are no datasets yet to validate the model results.
Refillable containers, reusable packaging with deposits and refill stations aim to replace single-use packaging rather than recycle it. They are being tested by retailers and cities, but they need shared systems for return and washing, and their benefit depends on how often each container is actually reused.
Processes that break plastics down into chemical building blocks or fuels aim to handle mixed and contaminated plastics that mechanical recycling cannot. Plants operate at limited scale, and their energy use, costs, the share of output that becomes new plastic rather than fuel and the fate of hazardous additives are still disputed.
Implementation gap
About 1.5 billion people in the Global South have no waste collection, and uncollected waste causes 68% of plastic pollution there. Building and running collection services needs steady local funding that many fast-growing towns do not have.
Technology gap
Only 15% of plastic waste was collected for recycling in 2019, and nearly 40% of that was lost in sorting and processing. Mixed polymers, additives and contamination keep quality low, so recycled plastic made up just 6% of plastics use.
Coordination gap
Treaty negotiations in Geneva in August 2025, with delegates from 183 countries, adjourned without consensus on a text, and the Chair later resigned. A new Chair was elected in February 2026, but there is still no agreed text.
Coordination gap
Without intervention, plastic production is projected to nearly triple by 2060. Waste management alone cannot keep up with that growth, but measures that reduce production and use require agreement between producing and consuming countries.
Knowledge gap
More than 16,000 chemicals can be present in plastics, and hazard data are not publicly available for more than two-thirds of them. This makes it hard to regulate harmful substances or to make sure recycled plastic is safe.
Knowledge gap
Estimates of how much plastic escapes rely on models, because robust and verifiable data on waste management are scarce and there are no datasets to check the model outputs. Country figures can therefore differ widely between studies.
Unresolved questions, not vetted breakthroughs. Answering any of them would change what is possible.
Tiny plastic particles are being reported in many human tissues, but measuring the smallest particles is difficult and contamination of samples is hard to rule out. Whether they cause disease, at what doses, and how much of any harm comes from the particles or from their chemicals is still unknown.
Estimates of yearly plastic inputs to the ocean differ several-fold depending on methods, and much plastic appears to stay in rivers, on coasts and in sediments. Better field measurements are needed to close the balance and to judge which interventions matter most.
Which of the thousands of chemicals in plastics are hazardous, how they move into food, water and air, and whether recycling can keep them out of new products are open questions, as is the safety of substitutes.
Which combinations of bans, taxes, design rules and reuse systems reduce total plastic use, and how can they avoid simply moving impacts to other materials, other countries or the waste pickers whose income depends on plastic?
Carry a reusable bottle, bag or cup, and choose refills or products with less packaging where they are available. Single-use items make up a large share of all plastic produced.
Follow local sorting rules so that recyclable plastic is not contaminated, and do not burn plastic waste at home or in the open: the smoke releases potentially hazardous substances.
Local river, lake or beach clean-ups remove litter where it causes harm. Logging the items you collect through a citizen-science programme helps show which products end up as litter most often.
Tell your local and national representatives that you support measures such as deposit-return schemes, producer responsibility and an effective global treaty, and ask businesses you buy from about refill and take-back options.
Ideas visitors sent in for this challenge, read by the DO GOOD team and pinned with permission. The colour shows the kind of contribution.
Loading the board…
What happens next
The DO GOOD team reads every idea and sorts it by colour: solution, research question, existing project, evidence or local action.
If you agree to publication, it can be pinned to this board. Contact details are never shown.
Pinned ideas are not reviewed by scientists and are not endorsed by DO GOOD.
This page is a research overview. DO GOOD does not run a dedicated programme on this challenge, and donations are not earmarked for it. You can join our volunteer work and outreach.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), February 2022, published 2022
Launch of the OECD Global Plastics Outlook: Economic Drivers, Environmental Impacts and Policy Options (22 February 2022, doi 10.1787/de747aef-en), still the most detailed global accounting of plastic flows. Source of the 2019 figures: 353 million tonnes of plastic waste, doubling in two decades, 9% recycled, 15% collected for recycling and losses in recycling, 6% recycled content, leakage to the environment, rivers, lakes and ocean, accumulated plastic in aquatic environments, waste per person by region and life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions (Chapter 2 of the report).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), October 2024, published 2024
Launch of the OECD's newer modelling report (2 October 2024), which compares policy scenarios of different ambition. Source of the finding that comprehensive global policies across the plastics life cycle could reduce leakage into the environment by 96% by 2040.
The Lancet, vol. 406, pp. 1044–59 (Landrigan PJ, Dunlop S, Treskova M, et al.), published online 3 August 2025, published 2025
Launch paper of an independent monitoring system on plastics and health (doi 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01447-3; full text hosted by the University of Maryland). Source of production figures for 1950, 2022 and the 2060 projection, the share of single-use items, chemicals in plastics, evidence and uncertainty on micro- and nanoplastics in human tissues, and groups most affected.
Nature, vol. 633, pp. 101–108 (Cottom JW, Cook E, Velis CA), 4 September 2024, published 2024
Peer-reviewed global inventory of plastic pollution from municipal waste for 2020, covering 50,702 municipalities (doi 10.1038/s41586-024-07758-6; open-access copy in the White Rose Research Online repository). Source of the 52.1 million tonne estimate, the share burned in the open, country and regional figures, and the role of uncollected waste.
Science Advances, vol. 7, no. 18, eaaz5803 (Meijer LJJ, van Emmerik T, van der Ent R, Schmidt C, Lebreton L), 30 April 2021, published 2021
Peer-reviewed model of plastic emissions from rivers to the ocean for 2015, and the basis of the mismanaged plastic waste map. Source of the 0.8–2.7 million tonne range of riverine emissions, the model uncertainty, and the concentration of emissions in more than 1,000 rivers, many of them small urban rivers.
UN Environment Programme (UNEP), published 2026
Official record of the treaty negotiations: the press release of 15 August 2025 on the Geneva session (INC-5.2) adjourning without consensus, the advisory on the former Chair's resignation, and the press release of 7 February 2026 on the election of Ambassador Julio Cordano of Chile as Chair.