Safe Surgery for Everyone

    An estimated 5 billion people cannot get safe, affordable surgical and anaesthesia care when they need it, at least 160 million needed operations go undone each year, and tens of millions of people face financial catastrophe because of what surgery costs them.

    Updated 9 min read6 sources

    Written from the sources listed below, not independently peer-reviewed.

    Take a guess first

    In low-income and lower-middle-income countries, how many people out of every 100 cannot access basic surgical care, according to the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery?

    5 billion

    People without safe, affordable surgery

    Modelled estimate of people who cannot get safe, affordable surgical and anaesthesia care when needed. It has not been updated since 2015, and a 2025 review found it unlikely to have improved.

    Data year 2015. Source: Meara J.G. et al., The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, The Lancet, 2015

    160 million+

    Operations needed but not done each year

    Unmet need estimated in 2025 against the benchmark of 5,000 operations per 100,000 people a year, up from 143 million in the 2015 estimate.

    Data year 2025. Source: Nepogodiev D. et al., The Lancet 406(10505):860–880, 23 August 2025, 2025

    81.3 million

    People facing catastrophic costs for surgery each year

    Modelled estimate: 32.8 million from the costs of surgery itself and 48.5 million from non-medical costs of getting care. 3.7 billion people are at risk if they need an operation.

    Data year 2015. Source: Shrime M.G. et al., The Lancet Global Health 3, 2015

    The numbers

    Estimated operations needed but not done each year

    Unit: million operations

    05010015020014320151602025

    Years are when the estimates were made: the Lancet Commission's 2015 estimate (based on 2012 surgical volumes) and the 2025 review, which gives at least 160 million. Both are modelled gaps against a benchmark of 5,000 operations per 100,000 people, not counts of patients, so the change is approximate.

    Far from the 2030 targets for surgery

    Safe surgery is part of SDG target 3.8 on universal health coverage. In 2015 the World Health Assembly adopted resolution WHA68.15 on emergency and essential surgical care and anaesthesia, and the Lancet Commission set six targets for 2030. A 2025 review found that only 26% of low- and middle-income countries are on track for the access target, that no low-income or lower-middle-income country has reached the volume benchmark, and that no country with data has met the targets for protection from catastrophic or impoverishing costs. In May 2026 the World Health Assembly approved a Global Strategy for Integrated Emergency, Critical and Operative Care 2026–2035, with an action plan and targets due by the end of 2026.

    Who is left behind

    Where it hits hardest

    Each country is shaded by its latest available value, so you can see where the gap is widest. Hover or tap a country, search for one, or open the full table.

    Shortage of specialist surgeons, anaesthetists and obstetricians

    Loading country values…

    Loading map…

    Values in per 100,000 people.

    Specialist surgeons, anaesthetists and obstetricians per 100,000 people, so darker shades mean fewer specialists; the Lancet Commission's target is at least 20. Values are the latest year available per country and are old, mostly 2013–2018 (one as early as 2008); they leave out non-physician providers such as nurse anaesthetists and clinical officers, and very small territories can show extreme values.

    Source: Lancet Commission on Global Surgery and WHO Collaborating Centre for Surgery and Public Health (Lund University), via World Bank Open Data. Latest year available per country; years differ.

    Values load from World Bank Open Data. Simplified Natural Earth borders; they imply no position on disputed territories.

    Are we making progress?

    Instead of one “percent solved” score, DO GOOD rates three separate dimensions. A problem can have mature solutions that still reach too few people. These ratings are an editorial reading of the sources on this page, not a measured index.

    Solution maturity

    How mature and validated are the available solutions?

    High

    The procedures that matter most, such as caesarean delivery, laparotomy and fracture care, are long established and the Commission described surgery as highly cost-effective. Evidence on how to deliver them safely in low-resource hospitals is thinner: of nine randomised trials of safety measures in low- and middle-income countries, none has shown a significant reduction in deaths.

    Confidence in the data

    Low

    Access and financial risk figures are models from around 2015 that have not been updated, very few countries have reported workforce data since 2019, and many health systems cannot routinely record deaths after surgery.

    Current trajectory

    Stalling

    Global surgical volume grew only modestly, from 234 million operations in 2008 to 266 million in 2019, not keeping pace with need, and most national surgical plans remain unfunded. The 2026 WHO strategy creates a new framework, but its targets are not yet set.

    Why this matters

    Surgery is not only for rare or complex illness. Caesarean delivery, emergency abdominal operations, the treatment of open fractures and injuries, and cancer operations are part of everyday health care, and each needs a trained team, anaesthesia, a working operating theatre and safe follow-up. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery estimated in 2015 that 5 billion people do not have access to safe, affordable surgical and anaesthesia care when they need it, and that conditions needing surgical care caused about 16.9 million deaths in 2010, a third of all deaths worldwide. WHO now estimates that conditions which timely emergency, critical and operative care could address cause 38 million deaths a year. A 2025 review found no sign that the access estimate has improved, put the unmet need at no fewer than 160 million operations a year, and estimated that 3.5 million adults die within 30 days of surgery each year, which shows that safety after an operation matters as much as access to one.

    The gap follows income. Of roughly 313 million operations performed worldwide in 2012, only 6.3% took place in the countries home to the poorest 37.3% of the world's population, and the unmet need is largest in sub-Saharan Africa, followed by South and Southeast Asia. Where human development is lowest, surgery is dominated by childbirth: obstetric procedures make up 35% of operations in those countries, against 7% in the countries with the highest human development. Paying for care is a second barrier. An estimated 81.3 million people a year face catastrophic spending to get surgery, 48.5 million of them because of the non-medical costs of reaching and staying at a hospital, and within every country the burden falls on the poor. Untreated surgical conditions also cost economies dearly: the Commission projected US$12.3 trillion in lost output for low- and middle-income countries between 2015 and 2030.

    How access to surgery is measured

    The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery defined surgical care broadly, to include operations, anaesthesia, obstetric care and the management of surgical conditions without operating. Access means that care exists, can be reached in time, is safe and is affordable. In 2015 the Commission proposed six indicators with targets for 2030, grouped here into four:

    • Timely access to essential surgery

      The share of the population that can reach, within two hours, a facility able to perform three 'bellwether' procedures: caesarean delivery, laparotomy (opening the abdomen) and treatment of an open fracture. The target is at least 80% coverage in every country by 2030.

    • Specialist surgical workforce

      The number of specialist surgeons, anaesthetists and obstetricians per 100,000 people, with a target of at least 20 in every country by 2030. It leaves out non-physician providers such as nurse anaesthetists, who account for 2.3 of the 8.8 anaesthesia providers per 100,000 people worldwide.

    • Surgical volume and perioperative mortality

      The number of operations per 100,000 people, with a benchmark of at least 5,000 a year, and the perioperative mortality rate, the share of patients who die after surgery. Unmet need is estimated as the gap between a country's volume and the benchmark, so it measures capacity, not every individual's need.

    • Protection from catastrophic and impoverishing costs

      The share of people who would face catastrophic spending (out-of-pocket costs above a set share of income) or be pushed into poverty if they needed surgery. These are modelled estimates, not survey counts, and they depend strongly on how catastrophic spending is defined.

    What already works, and its limits

    National surgical, obstetric and anaesthesia plans

    What works

    A national plan sets out how a country will build its surgical workforce, hospitals, supplies, financing and data, and links surgery to the rest of the health system. As of July 2024, 23 countries had an active plan and 40 had surgical provisions within broader national health plans.

    Limits

    26 countries had plans that had expired, and most plans remain unfunded. Nigeria's plan was costed at US$16.8 billion over five years, far beyond what many health budgets can absorb without outside support.

    Strong first-referral hospitals

    What works

    District or first-referral hospitals that can reliably perform the bellwether procedures (caesarean delivery, laparotomy and treatment of open fractures) within two hours' reach of most people cover most emergency surgical needs and support obstetric care.

    Limits

    These hospitals have a median of one surgeon, compared with 20 in tertiary hospitals, and electricity outages affect 40% of hospitals overall and 90% in low-income countries. Buildings without staff, power, oxygen and supplies do not provide surgery.

    Training specialists and sharing tasks

    What works

    Countries are expanding training for surgeons, anaesthetists and obstetricians and also rely on non-physician providers, such as nurse anaesthetists and clinical officers. The global anaesthesia workforce has grown, and task shifting appears safe for selected patients undergoing caesarean section.

    Limits

    The world is short of more than 1 million surgeons and anaesthetists, and more evidence is needed on which tasks can safely be shared and how providers should be supervised.

    Safety checklists and a culture of safety

    What works

    Building a safety culture, for example through the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, reduces deaths after surgery. The checklist is a short set of checks that the operating team completes together at set points before, during and after an operation.

    Limits

    A checklist only helps where it is actually used. A trial of a modified checklist in maternity theatres found no overall fall in deaths, although hospitals that implemented it well saw larger reductions in maternal deaths.

    Financial protection for surgical care

    What works

    Including surgery and anaesthesia in publicly financed benefit packages or national health insurance, as in Ghana, or community-based health insurance, as in Rwanda, reduces what patients pay at the point of care.

    Limits

    More than half of the estimated 81.3 million catastrophic cases a year are caused by non-medical costs of getting care, which insurance for hospital fees does not cover.

    Innovations to watch

    Promising, but not proven at scale. The stage shows how far each approach has come; it is not a recommendation.

    Early deployment

    Large international cohort studies of surgical outcomes

    Because routine recording of deaths after surgery is not feasible in many health systems, researchers propose short international studies that follow every operation in participating hospitals for a set period. Whether they can become a standing monitoring system with national targets is still open.

    Pilots

    Measuring hospital preparedness for surgery

    The 2025 review proposes that countries measure the readiness of their hospitals with a Surgical Preparedness Index, as one of 13 benchmarks for 2025–35. Its usefulness depends on countries adopting it and acting on the results.

    Pilots

    Telemedicine and low-cost digital records

    Telemedicine can bring specialist advice to distant hospitals, reduce costs for patients and hospitals and cut emissions, and several low-cost, open-access electronic health records have been developed. Evidence that they improve surgical outcomes in low-income settings is still limited.

    What is holding progress back

    Implementation gap:
    Solutions work but reach too few people. Needs infrastructure, funding and organisation.
    Coordination gap:
    Actors are not aligned. Needs standards, partnerships and better incentives.
    Technology gap:
    Principle known, not yet workable in practice. Needs applied research.
    Knowledge gap:
    Cause or mechanism not understood. Needs basic research.

    Questions nobody has answered yet

    Unresolved questions, not vetted breakthroughs. Answering any of them would change what is possible.

    How many people really lack access

    How can access to timely, safe and affordable surgery be measured directly and repeatedly, for example from travel times to equipped hospitals, rather than relying on models from a decade ago?

    Which safety measures save lives

    Which affordable changes in practice, such as checklists, infection control or monitoring after surgery, actually reduce deaths and complications in hospitals with few staff and limited equipment?

    Safe limits of task sharing

    Which operations and anaesthesia tasks can non-physician providers perform safely, with what training and supervision, and how does this affect outcomes beyond caesarean section?

    Protecting people from non-medical costs

    How can health systems reduce travel, food and lost-income costs that cause most catastrophic spending on surgery, and which financing models do this at national scale?

    What you can do

    • Support organisations that train surgical teams

      Donate to or volunteer with established organisations that train surgeons, anaesthetists, obstetric teams and nurses in low- and middle-income countries, and look for programmes that build lasting local capacity.

    • Ask whether surgery is covered

      When health coverage and budgets are discussed in your country, ask whether surgery, anaesthesia and emergency obstetric care are included in what is covered and whether patients are protected from high costs.

    • Share your clinical skills responsibly

      If you work in surgery, anaesthesia, obstetrics or biomedical engineering, consider long-term teaching partnerships with hospitals in low-resource settings, led by the needs of local teams.

    • Learn and talk about the gap

      Many people assume surgery is a luxury in poorer countries. Sharing reliable information, such as the work of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, helps make the case that safe surgery is basic health care.

    Ideas from the community

    Ideas visitors sent in for this challenge, read by the DO GOOD team and pinned with permission. The colour shows the kind of contribution.

    Loading the board…

    Add your idea

    0/120
    0/2000
    Publication

    Your email or phone number is never published.

    What you type is kept in this browser until you send it, so you can come back later.

    What happens next

    The DO GOOD team reads every idea and sorts it by colour: solution, research question, existing project, evidence or local action.

    If you agree to publication, it can be pinned to this board. Contact details are never shown.

    Pinned ideas are not reviewed by scientists and are not endorsed by DO GOOD.

    Connected challenges

    Get involved with DO GOOD

    This page is a research overview. DO GOOD does not run a dedicated programme on this challenge, and donations are not earmarked for it. You can join our volunteer work and outreach.

    Sources

    1. [1]Surgical health policy 2025–35: strengthening essential services for tomorrow's needs

      Nepogodiev D. et al., The Lancet 406(10505):860–880, 23 August 2025 (repository copy, University of the Witwatersrand), published 2025

      Peer-reviewed review of progress against the Lancet Commission's 2030 indicators ten years on (DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00985-7). Source of the unmet need of at least 160 million operations (and the earlier 143 million), 3.5 million postoperative deaths, workforce and volume target attainment by income group, national plan counts, power outages, caesarean gap, trial evidence and the 2025–35 benchmarks.

    2. [2]Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development

      Meara J.G. et al., The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, The Lancet (published online 27 April 2015; copy hosted by UCSF), published 2015

      The Commission's report (DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-X). Source of the 5 billion people without access, nine in ten without access in low- and lower-middle-income countries, 16.9 million deaths in 2010, the distribution of 313 million operations, US$12.3 trillion in projected losses, and the six indicators, bellwether procedures and 2030 targets.

    3. [3]Catastrophic expenditure to pay for surgery worldwide: a modelling study

      Shrime M.G. et al., The Lancet Global Health 3 (Suppl 2), April 2015 (DOAJ record), published 2015

      Peer-reviewed modelling study prepared for the Lancet Commission. Source of the 3.7 billion people at risk of catastrophic spending if they need surgery and the 81.3 million annual cases (32.8 million from surgical costs, 48.5 million from non-medical costs), concentrated among the poor.

    4. [4]The Global Anesthesia Workforce Survey: Updates and trends in the anesthesia workforce

      Law T.J. et al., Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2024 (abstract record, Aga Khan University eCommons), published 2024

      World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists survey of national societies, 2021–2023, with responses for 172 of 193 UN member states. Source of the global density of 8.8 anaesthesia providers per 100,000, the 76 countries with fewer than 5 physician providers per 100,000, and trends by income group and region.

    5. [5]Draft global strategy for integrated emergency, critical and operative care, 2026–2035 (EB158/11)

      World Health Organization, Executive Board document, 3 December 2025, published 2025

      WHO's draft strategy recommended to the Seventy-ninth World Health Assembly. Source of the estimate that conditions addressable by emergency, critical and operative care cause 38 million deaths and 1.3 billion disability-adjusted life years a year, of the catastrophic spending linked to out-of-pocket and non-medical costs, and the plan for targets by 2035.

    6. [6]Seventy-ninth World Health Assembly – Daily update: 22 May 2026

      World Health Organization (news release, 22 May 2026), published 2026

      Confirms that the World Health Assembly approved the Global Strategy for Integrated Emergency, Critical and Operative Care 2026–2035 and that WHO will draft an action plan with targets by the end of 2026.

    Cite this page

    DO GOOD International (2026). Safe Surgery for Everyone. Global Challenges. Updated October 15, 2026. https://www.dogood.world/challenges/surgical-care

    For figures, please cite the original sources listed above.

    All global challenges